The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . The Christian Science Monitor has expired. Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . Often, people who are trying to sell whatever it is they're trying to sell try to justify it on the basis of science. If your mind is the "observer" that quantum physics talks about, you should be able to choose which of the many possible realities around you comes into existence you can create your own reality, and probably come off anti-anxiety medication to boot. Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". What the Bleep Do We Know!? On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! At the end of this article, Dr Simons invites readers to explore the limitations of their own brains. Miceal Ledwith Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. (It's all to do with photons of light from your measuring instrument hitting the poor electron and knocking it for six). It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. Ive not seen the movie, and dont intend to, but David Alberts book on Quantum Mechanics and Experience is one of the best things Ive read on the interpretation of QM. It's used as an excuse to be even weirder. The debate here is that we'll be able to use quantum mechanics to break codes, in particular to determine the big prime numbers that are at the basis of the security of your credit cards and your bank cards. But the movie gradually moves to quantum 'insights' that lead a woman to toss away her antidepressant medication, to the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior, and on to even greater nonsense." Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. She works as a free-lancer for an agency, where her boss is played by Barry Newman. My FIL is a ex-Air force Pilot. Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. Sol. To date, there has been no response as to where the information which lead to the story about the indians not being able to see the ships of Columbus originated from. Use this form to email 'What the bleep are they on about?' On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. About. IE 11 is not supported. It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". We If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. In 1958 nasa started mapping the ocean and exploring it. Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. . !" is a radical departure from convention. Not everything is possible. Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message. We hear more and more from JZ Knight, a woman channeling the ancient warrior Ramtha, a chap who (through Knight) incidentally leads the Ramtha School of Enlightenment. Certainly, our attitudes and brain chemistry affect how we see the world and get through life. All those things can be attributed to quantum mechanics first of all, because it's so poorly understood by the public, and especially because it's so verifiably weird. But most of the talking heads' quotes seem either to have a hidden agenda, or to be sliced and diced to buttress Ramtha's ideas. Can the weirdness of quantum mechanics make you well, or make you wealthy? [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. They are relevant because of the deliberateness on the part of the film makers to keep certain facts unknown (ironically, it is I making the unknown know) and misrepresent others. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. We're such a shallow people. Though not marketed as such, those who have seen it note that it degenerates into an extended infomercial for channeler J. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles this only applies to sub-atomic particlesa rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." According to his books, water exposed to loving words shows brilliant and attractive patterns, while water exposed to negative thoughts forms incomplete patterns. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Pingback: Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, Pingback: For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). [5] Foreign gross added another $5 million for a worldwide gross of nearly $16 million. ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." That's not the case. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. The weirdness of quantum mechanics is reserved for either very specially prepared configurations in the laboratory, or scales that are so small that quantum-mechanical effects are significant. John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. Z. Knight and her pet dead guy Ramtha. But we're certainly using them at the Large Hadron Collider, which we couldn't even operate if we didn't have superconducting magnets. subscription. The question "What the bleep do we know?" has an unambiguous answer: both surprisingly much and amazingly little. HCI president Peter Vegso stated that in regard to this book, "What the Bleep is the quantum leap in the New Age world," and "by marrying science and spirituality, it is the foundation of future thought."[5]. We are connected to the world by many things: by light and sound and heat. One should take seriously the danger that hes not the only one deluding himself. "What The Bleep Do We Know? Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. In reality, science is completely incidental to the film's conclusions. Skeptic James Randi described the film as "a fantasy docudrama" and "[a] rampant example of abuse by charlatans and cults". have described distinct assertions made as pseudoscience. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. 3. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? 7. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? A roommate of mine was interested in TM and I think it was he who introduced us. DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! If he says hes being misrepresented, I quite believe him. People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. extended versions of What the BLEEP Do We Know! But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money. There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way. Nasa found something. Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. Last night I went to see a movie which was advertised as being about quantum physics, called What the Bleep Do We Know?. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. The quantum mechanical correlations, the spooky action at a distance that quantum mechanics brings up, is true only for very specially prepared systems that are isolated from the rest of the world, completely. You can begin to be skeptical that the speaker is somehow trying to use quantum mechanics to argue fundamentally that you can change the world by thinking about it. "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". You are free to comment as you wish. But is reality really in the eye of the quantum observer? A: Quantum mechanics is often quoted as the explanation for many things, because it's so weird that people latch onto it as a hope, to explain everything that they would like to believe about the universe. Extreme quantum mechanics could be the name of the speciality of SF writer (and physicist) Greg Egan. And wait-the human body is mostly water! On certain scales, for certain times, in certain regions, everything goes and strange things happen. That would be, very hard to quantify:). Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013. is released on Friday. These photos may well be art they're sure as hell not science. Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf Of Hagelins thousands of citations, how many are from the Ellis/Nanopoulous et al paper mill? Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. This is the first coronavirus vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates. Even so it notched up $10m in. By 1984 he had moved to Maharishi University and started building up the physics department there. The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable. But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. What could be worse than being aware of every tiny detail that your brain handles from phosphate levels to heart rate and hair growth. But when you hear about quantum mechanics and consciousness, you should assume the author is a crackpot unless proven otherwise. Her experiences are offered by the filmmakers to illustrate the film's scientifically-unsupported thesis about quantum physics and consciousness. "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. Amit Goswami (PhD) in What the Bleep Do We Know?. 2) "What the Bleep Do We Know" has sure got a lot of people talking and thinking. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. If I didnt know any better, I would have thought it was something straight out of a Cheech and Chong movie. Cast. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. So does classical physics. While the (probabilistic) predictions of quantum mechanics are, as far . The flip side of that is that you can use quantum mechanics, again in specially prepared systems, to communicate in a way that will allow us to know when someone is eavesdropping. "I create my own reality, says quantum physics," intones one expert, and the viewer could be lured to accept this as proof. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too. That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . Andrew B Newberg, (MD, Radiologist), in What the Bleep Do We Know? His 73 papers are mostly about supersymmetric GUTs and considered quite respectable, with a total of over 5000 citations, including 641 citations for one of them alone. It is just a movie. Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. To some extent it could be, because memories and thoughts are stored at the molecular level, and at a molecular level quantum mechanics is significant. But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. Happy Water Crystals Debunked as PseudoScience June 23rd, 2018 - Are Dr Masaru Emoto?s Fantastic Claims Actually Real Via is masaru emoto . You dont have a Christian Science Monitor What the Bleep Do We Know!? We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. Photos View All Photos Movie Info Amanda, a divorced photographer, has a fantastic experience when life begins to unravel around her, revealing the cellular,. But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. But she is right about us not seeing things in front of our eyes if we're not looking for them. Where were we now? His list of "worst abusers" includes inspirational author Deepak Chopra, the best-selling book "The Secret" and the whole field of Transcendental Meditation. A lot of the propaganda from them was hilarious, especially whenever candidates attempted to hold public speeches and performing demonstrations of yogic flying. Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. Many religions and spiritual paths--from Hinduism, with its concept of maya, to Christian Science--teach that appearance is illusion. Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Dr Emoto takes photos of crystals formed in freezing water. They were showing us the pictures of the waves converging to a point a meditation trick and this picture had a caption explaining that the unified field theory has already been found. yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? What the #$*! Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. That's not always true, but it's often true. So what better thing to have than something that gives you everything you want? If anyone has any information to refute any of the facts laid out here, I will be more then willing to retract them. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. Krauss worries that a lot of people can be fooled by appeals to the admittedly weird world of quantum physics a world in which particles are said to take every possible path from point A to point B, in which the position and velocity of particles are necessarily cloaked in uncertainty, in which the mere act of observation changes the thing being observed. http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565, http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. It was the biggest bunch of garbage that I had ever seen. "What the Bleep Do We Know," as it is referred to for convenience, is not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. There's just this little matter of the science being a bit bleep. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Dr Candice Pert 8. I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. Prominent if you go by citations that is. There are also controlled, double-blind prayer studies out there much more interesting than the D.C. crime study cited in the film, though not necessarily more convincing. Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. [7], According to Publishers Weekly, the film was one of the sleeper hits of 2004, as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year." It is true that quantum mechanics is extremely strange, and on extremely small scales for short times, all sorts of weird things happen. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. . Joe Dispenza Many people are dubious that Penrose's suggestions are reasonable, because the brain is not an isolated quantum-mechanical system. Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. Daniel Monti, physician and director of the Mind-Body Medicine Program at.

Leah Pruett First Husband, Scott Walker Wife Beverley, Monklands Hospital Consultants, Articles W